Permanent product Record

NUTREX RESEARCH

Pre-Workout Essentials

CURRENTRecord last observed August 18, 2026high-stim

Nutrex Research Pre-Workout Essentials has a current Record. Last observed August 18, 2026. The current public formula contains 8 declared ingredient lines. Comparable formula history is not yet available.

Current Record

The current declared formula.

Printed label wording stays separate from FormulaSignal's normalized identity. Current formula observed August 3, 2026.

Serving size
Not recorded
Servings
Not recorded
Caffeine
200 mg per serving
Formula scope
PRODUCT WIDE
Nutrex Research Pre-Workout Essentials, current declared formula observed August 3, 2026. Each row gives the printed label wording, the declared amount, and FormulaSignal's normalized identity.
Original label wordingDeclared amountNormalized identity
Vitamin B6 (as Pyridoxine HCl)2 mgvitamin b6
Vitamin B12 (as Cyanocobalamin)200 mcgvitamin b12
Sodium (as Pink Himalayan Sea Salt)162 mgsodium from pink himalayan sea salt
L-Citrulline3000 mgl-citrulline
Creatine Monohydrate2000 mgcreatine monohydrate
Betaine Anhydrous1500 mgbetaine anhydrous
L-Tyrosine500 mgl-tyrosine
Caffeine Anhydrous200 mgcaffeine

Serving economics

Facts and calculations stay labeled.

Reliable serving economics are not available for this Record.

Historical timeline

Comparable formula states.

Dates below are observation dates. They are not exact reformulation dates.

Historical formula evidence is not yet sufficient for a reliable comparison. This does not establish that the product never changed.

Confirmed Signals

Reviewed changes in the public Record.

No confirmed public Signal is associated with this product. This is not a claim that the product never changed.

Research-dose context

Selected evidence, not a universal effective dose.

These comparisons retain the studied protocol, source, and limitations. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or a dose recommendation for this product.

A1

L-citrulline

Product declaration
L-Citrulline: 3000 mg
Selected studied range
3000 to 9000 mg
Protocol and duration
per day, in the studies NIH ODS summarizes
Studied context
Studied as a nitric-oxide pathway precursor (converted to arginine via the urea cycle) for aerobic exercise performance measures such as oxygen-uptake (VO2) kinetics, blood lactate, and rate of perceived exertion, and for acute resistance-exercise performance and muscle oxygenation. NIH ODS describes evidence for enhancing performance as limited, with few studies and conflicting results.
Limitations
A 2022 systematic review/meta-analysis found no significant benefit for endurance-performance outcomes specifically. A single 8 g acute dose did not enhance isometric force production, muscle endurance, or muscle-oxygenation parameters in one resistance-exercise study. NIH ODS characterizes overall performance-enhancement evidence as limited.

Selected evidence: NIH ODS, Dietary Supplements for Exercise and Athletic Performance · Open source

A2

Creatine monohydrate

Product declaration
Creatine Monohydrate: 2000 mg
Selected studied range
3000 to 5000 mg
Protocol and duration
per day maintenance, after an optional loading phase
Studied context
The ISSN 2017 position stand calls creatine monohydrate "the most effective ergogenic nutritional supplement currently available to athletes" for increasing high-intensity/intermittent exercise capacity and lean body mass during training. It also describes research into post-exercise recovery, injury prevention, thermoregulation, rehabilitation, concussion/spinal-cord neuroprotection, and use in clinical populations (aging-related sarcopenia, neurodegenerative disease, type 2 diabetes glycemic control), while noting creatine is "of little value" for pure endurance sports (per NIH ODS).
Limitations
ISSN 2017 states it is not yet established whether other creatine forms (e.g., creatine nitrate, or precursors like guanidinoacetic acid/GAA) produce greater muscle or brain creatine uptake than monohydrate. This is described as an active area of research, not a settled finding.

Selected evidence: ISSN position stand on creatine safety and efficacy, 2017 · Open source

A1

Betaine anhydrous

Product declaration
Betaine Anhydrous: 1500 mg
Selected studied range
2000 to 5000 mg
Protocol and duration
per day, studied for up to 15 days
Studied context
NIH ODS describes betaine as studied for strength- and power-based performance in bodybuilders and cyclists, with "potential but modest" improvements from a limited set of small, sometimes conflicting studies. A 2024/2025 systematic review focused specifically on endurance performance (VO2max, time-to-exhaustion, time-to-completion, power output).
Limitations
The endurance systematic review explicitly states "limited and inconclusive evidence regarding the definitive ergogenic effect of betaine supplementation on endurance exercise performance". Only 2 of 5 reviewed studies showed a significant improvement, and the authors call for "additional, more rigorous research."

Selected evidence: NIH ODS, Dietary Supplements for Exercise and Athletic Performance · Open source

A2

L-tyrosine

Product declaration
L-Tyrosine: 500 mg
Selected studied range
2000 to 2000 mg
Protocol and duration
per day for five days, in the cadet study
Studied context
Studied as the dietary precursor to norepinephrine for mitigating cognitive performance decrements under acute stress. A 2015 Military Medicine evidence review (rapid evidence assessment, 14 trials: 10 RCTs + 4 controlled clinical trials) issued a "weak recommendation" in favor of tyrosine for cognitive stress specifically, stating "all studies showed a positive effect" on that outcome. A widely cited primary study (Deijen et al. 1999, Brain Research Bulletin) gave cadets 2 g tyrosine daily for five days during a combat training course and found better memory and tracking-task performance, plus lower systolic blood pressure, versus a carbohydrate control.
Limitations
The 2015 Military Medicine review states explicitly that "no recommendation could be made" for tyrosine's effect on physical performance under stressful physical conditions, and concludes "available evidence is insufficient to make confident recommendations on the effectiveness of tyrosine for mitigating stress effects on physical/cognitive performance" overall, despite the positive signal on cognition. A separate heat-stress study found tyrosine ingestion did not influence cognitive function or physical performance during exercise heat stress despite raised serum tyrosine. NIH ODS's exercise/athletic-performance fact sheet does not cover tyrosine at all.

Selected evidence: Deijen et al., Brain Research Bulletin, 1999

A2

Caffeine

Product declaration
Total caffeine from all declared sources: 200 mg
Selected studied range
140 to 420 mg
Protocol and duration
2 to 6 mg per kg body mass, 15 to 60 minutes before exercise, shown here for a 70 kg adult
Studied context
Studied for endurance-type aerobic exercise (moderate to large ergogenic effect, most consistent evidence category per ISSN 2021), muscular endurance and movement velocity in resistance exercise (small to moderate effects), sprinting/jumping/throwing (2-7% improvements), and cognitive attention/vigilance under fatigue. NIH ODS notes it "might enhance performance in endurance-type activities... And intermittent, long-duration activities."
Limitations
Minimal effective dose remains unclear. Repeated-sprint performance benefit is inconsistent and the ISSN position stand says this "requires further research." Effects of habitual/chronic caffeine use on the ergogenic response are described as equivocal.

Selected evidence: ISSN position stand on caffeine and exercise performance, 2021, with NIH ODS · Open source

Cautions and regulatory records

A filing and a documented risk are not the same thing.

These attach to declared ingredients, not to this product as a whole. Nothing here establishes that the product is safe or unsafe. Talk with a qualified health professional.

No documented caution is recorded against the declared ingredients on this Record. That is not a finding that the product is safe.

Where the sources disagree

What we could not read cleanly.

A disagreement between sources is recorded rather than smoothed into one confident number. None of these is a Signal.

No source conflict is recorded on this Record. That is not a claim that every source agrees, only that none we read disagreed.

Evidence

Audit the material claims.

  • Nutrex Research

    P1 current formula source · observed August 3, 2026 · accessed August 3, 2026

    Open source evidence

Go deeper

Ask now, or keep watch.

No released consumer report is available for this product. Browse Reports.