Allmax Nutrition · Product Record
Allmax Nutrition Classic AllWhey
Allmax Nutrition Classic AllWhey has an under-review Record. Latest source capture September 29, 2026. A current public formula is not available. Comparable formula history is not yet available.
Source checks scheduled every week
Last valid reading Oct 12, 2026.
Recent check activity
- A valid source reading resolved an evidence limit. This does not establish a formula change.
- A valid source reading resolved an evidence limit. This does not establish a formula change.
Activity belongs to the Record. It is not evidence of checks performed for your account before you started watching. Source checks do not establish the contents of your tub.
FRESH CHECK
Buying again soon? Send this product to the front of the line and we’ll check the brand’s page again.
What a fresh check covers
Requests bring a source check forward. They do not scan your tub, guarantee a result, or start a subscription. Requests for the same product share a monitoring pass. Allowances reset monthly in UTC; guest allowances are shared by people on the same connection.
Under review means a newer source finding is open. Until review settles it, the formula below stays the one on the label dated September 27, 2026. Candidate findings are not public Signals.
Current Record
The current declared formula.
Printed label wording stays separate from FormulaSignal's normalized identity.
Nutrition Facts as printed for Chocolate, observed September 27, 2026.
- Protein per serving
- 30 g in a 46 g serving
- Serving size
- 1 scoop (46 g)
- Servings per container
- 49
- Calories
- 190
- Total carbohydrate
- 11 g
- Total sugars
- 4 g
- Added sugars
- Not on file
- Total fat
- 3 g
- Declared protein sources
- Cross-Flow Micro- Filtered Whey Protein Concentrate (in PURE WHEY PROTEIN BLEND), then Cross-Flow Ultra-Filtered Whey Protein Isolate (in PURE WHEY PROTEIN BLEND), then Sodium Caseinate (in Coconut Creamer). In the order the ingredient statement lists them; the label gives no amount for each.
- Allergen statement
- No allergen statement on file.
PARTIAL RECORD
A current public formula is not available.
The canonical identity remains in the Registry, but current evidence is not sufficient for ingredient-level public analysis.
Limit on price and package. Evidence needed to lift it: An offer observation taken on the same day as a panel read of this product, paired through pair-panel-price.mjs, which would size-match the Chocolate label's ~2254 g against the 5 lb variant. Registering each package weight as its own product would also resolve it.
Serving economics
Facts and calculations stay labeled.
Reliable serving economics are not available for this Record.
Historical timeline
Comparable formula states.
Dates below are observation dates. They are not exact reformulation dates.
Historical formula evidence is not yet sufficient for a reliable comparison. This does not establish that the product never changed.
Confirmed Signals
Reviewed changes in the public Record.
No confirmed public Signal is associated with this product. This is not a claim that the product never changed.
Research-dose context
Selected evidence, not a universal effective dose.
These comparisons retain the studied protocol, source, and limitations. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or a dose recommendation for this product.
Qualifying research context is unavailable for the current public formula.
Cautions and regulatory records
A filing and a documented risk are not the same thing.
These attach to declared ingredients, not to this product as a whole. Nothing here establishes that the product is safe or unsafe. Talk with a qualified health professional.
Ingredient-level gates need a current public formula, which this Record does not have.
Where the sources disagree
What we could not read cleanly.
A disagreement between sources is recorded rather than smoothed into one confident number. None of these is a Signal.
Open, still being reconciled
UNDER REVIEW · OBSERVED SEPTEMBER 29, 2026
The same shape. The Chocolate panel, read 2026-09-29 against the page preserved 2026-09-27, states 1 scoop (46 g) and about 49 servings, which is about 2254 g, close to the listing's 5 lb variant. The offer observed 2026-09-29 records $23.99 at basis PROMOTIONAL, and the listing prices ten variants across 1 lb, 2 lb and 5 lb in five flavors, so nothing on file says which package that price buys on the day the label was read. pair-panel-price.mjs refused the pairing.
Use your own numbers
Check the cost of your tub.
Use the price you paid and your label’s protein grams. If you have a matching lab report, the unit converter keeps its reporting limits intact; this Record does not establish heavy metal levels in your tub.
Where to buy
Buy it, knowing which label you are getting.
Compare the label on the listing or the tub with the dated one above.
FormulaSignal earns nothing from these links. A seller's stock can carry an older label than the one dated here.
Evidence
Audit the material claims.
Allmax Nutrition
P1 product page capture · observed September 27, 2026 · accessed September 27, 2026
Open source evidence
Go deeper
Save it while the evidence catches up.
The ask interface will refuse an ingredient question on this product until a current formula is on file. An evidence review on this product is still open, so there is no settled label to compare a change against yet. Your Locker keeps it free, with the dates the Record holds.
This page is the dated record we hold. FormulaSignal publishes no scored verdict for any product.